Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 1111 - United States v. McCurdy

United States v. McCurdy’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 1111 · 1994

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
8
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 24 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably United States v. Hernandez (1996), United States v. Lang (1996)

38 federal appellate · 24 district · 8 state decisions

450199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Arizona v. Fulminante · Colorado v. Connelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a court should consider, inter alia, physical mistreatment, use of violence, promises or inducements, deception or trickery, and the physical or mental condition and capacity of the defendant within the totality of the circumstances.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The 'government must show that there was no duress or coercion, express or implied, that the consent was unequivocal and specific, and that it was freely and intelligently given.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the government must prove both the voluntariness of the consent under the totality of the circumstances and that there was a break in the causal connection between the illegality and the evidence obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.