Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 1300 - Geller v. Ranbi

Geller v. Ranbi’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 1300 · 1994

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bender (1997), Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia (1997)

12 federal appellate · 5 district ·

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Molinaro v. New Jersey · Green v. Drexler · Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corp. · Confederate Memorial Ass'n v. Hines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]y presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law; (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have eviden-tiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]ithin 11 days of the date of service or at such other time as the Court may direct ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.