United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
40 F.3d 154 · 1994
Citation profile
54 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably United States v. Taylor (1995), United States v. Maloney (1995)
54 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Marion · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Iannelli v. United States · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any challenge on appeal to the sufficiency of the evidence absent a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“specific, concrete allegations supported by evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.