Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 362 - United States v. Hayes

United States v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 362 · 1994

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
5
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. Lewis (1997), United States v. Crouch (1996)

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

2101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1513 · 18 U.S.C. § 231 (Civil Obedience Act of 1968) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on United States v. Olano · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · United States v. Marion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this circuit, the defendant must show that he suffered substantial prejudice and that the delay was the product of deliberate action by the Government to gain a tactical advantage”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.