Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

40 F.3d 474

Docket No. 93-5401.

Wilson v. Babbitt

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Oct. 18, 1994. Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied Jan. 17, 1995.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-10-18

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1994

12 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of counsel. The court is satisfied, after reviewing the parties' briefs, that appropriate disposition of the case does not call for further opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b).

¶2

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order and judgment from which this appeal has been taken be AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion of November 18, 1993.

¶3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(2). This instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party at any time to move for expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.

/40/f3d/474 · .json · Public domain