Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 789 - Barker v. Shalala

Barker v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 789 · 1994

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
July 2020
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Jones v. Apfel (1999), Doyal v. Barnhart (2003)

20 federal appellate · 6 district ·

3801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on King v. Heckler · J.c. Wyckoff & Associates, Inc. v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company · Mimms v. Heckler · Smith v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not the sole source of admissible information concerning jobs.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The treating physician doctrine is based on the assumption that a medical professional who has dealt with a claimant and his maladies over a long period of time will have a deeper insight into the medical condition of the claimant than will a person who has examined a claimant but once, or who has only seen the claimant's medical records.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t would be manifestly inappropriate to make the [DOT ] the sole source of evidence concerning gainful employment”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.