Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 F.3d 906 - Peabody Coal Company v. Director Office of Workers' Compensation Programs US Department of Labor

Peabody Coal Company v. Director Office of Workers' Compensation Programs US Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

40 F.3d 906 · 1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
August 2001
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 901 · 30 U.S.C. § 932 · 30 U.S.C. § 934 · 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 919 · 33 U.S.C. § 921

Relies on Pyro Mining Co. v. Slaton · Bethenergy Mines Inc 93-3428 v. Director Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Bethenergy Mines Inc 93-3429 · Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. Vahalik · B & S Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any case where there has been a refusal or neglect to pay the liability imposed under [§ 934(b)(2) ], the Secretary may bring a civil action in a district court of the United States to enforce the lien of the United States under this section with respect to such liability or to subject any property, of whatever nature, of the operator, or in which he has any right, title, or interest, to the payment of such liability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If any operator liable to the fund under [§ 934(b)(1) ] refuses to pay, after demand, the amount of such liability (including interest), then there shall be a lien in favor of the United States for such amount upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to such operator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]here is no statute explicitly providing for administrative review of the Department of Labor's computation of the interest due under Sec. 934(b), nor is there one explicitly providing for judicial review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.