United States v. Scat, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990)
Relies on Hughey v. United States · Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Hazard v. Penick · Schwarz v. Federal Bureau of Investigation · United States v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“authorizes restitution for every victim harmed in the course of the defendant's scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, not just the offense of conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.