Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 FLA 509 - Roberson v. State

Roberson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
9
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State (1959), Wallace v. State (1899)

76 state decisions

1501898190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garner v. State · Lester v. State · Jenkins v. State · Knickerbocker v. . the People · Lambright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he opinion of a witness as to the identity of a person seen by him is admissible in all cases where the witness has a previous personal acquaintance with or knowledge of such person, and bases his opinion upon such acquaintance or knowledge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The court correctly refused to permit these questions to be answered, for the answers, whether affirmative or negative, could have had no bearing upon the qualifications of the proposed jurors. The law does not require jurors to be lawyers, and, if it should become necessary upon the trial for them to know the definition of circumstantial evidence, they could be taught that definition by proper instructions from the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “proof of any fact with its circumstances, even though amounting to a separate crime, if it has some relevant bearing upon the issue being tried, is admissible in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.