Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 FSUPP2D 1 - Adams v. Clinton

Adams v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 2000
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Hagans v. Lavine · Rosado v. Wyman · Perez v. Ledesma · Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.