In Re Boeing Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21e of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · English v. General Electric Co. · Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To interpret the safe harbor protection of underlying assumptions in the manner suggested by the defendants would allow the exception to swallow the rule. Virtually any factual assertion by a business entity would be subject to safe harbor protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The mere publication of inaccurate accounting figures, or a failure to follow GAAP, without more, does not establish scienter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires more than a misapplication of accounting principles.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.