40 F. Supp. 2d 170 - Commonwealth Associates v. Letsos’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1653 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Bibby v. United States · Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. · Kelly v. Robinson · Harker v. United States · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Bobker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hile the procedures utilized in private arbitration do not constitute state action... the application of the coercive power of a court to confirm and enforce an arbitration award is arguably another matter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.