40 F. Supp. 3d 198 - Piccone v. Bartels’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in an action for writing or for publishing a libel may introduce in evidence the truth of the matter contained in the publication charged as libellous; and the truth shall be a justification unless actual malice is proved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Piccone v. Bartels“CARBONE: Ok. So their story did pan out. BARTELS: It did. CARBONE: It’s just that they really weren’t too social about it. BARTELS: No. They weren’t.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Piccone v. Bartels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.