40 F. Supp. 3d 657 - Does 1-5 v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Ex Parte: Edward T Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“or be proactively threatened with prosecution prior to violation, in order to have standing to challenge its constitutionality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the State has not disclaimed any intention of enforcing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.