Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

40 Ill. 121

Comstock v. Hitt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1865-04-15

Counsel inquired whether one party would be allowed to argue the cause orally upon the first call of the docket, and the other party have the same right upon the second call.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1865-04-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1930

5 state decisions

1018651870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1We cannot allow that to be done, even by consent of parties. If the case is argued orally on the first call of the docket by one party and not by the other, we will then take it for consideration, and no subsequent oral argument will be heard.

/40/ill/121 · .json · Public domain