Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

40 Ill. 58

Gillespie v. Rout

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1866

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1866-01-15

<p>Printed briefs must he filed, even though there he a printed argument, unless the points are clearly and separately set down in the argument, with the authorities in support thereof immediately following.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1919

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1866-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1We cannot dispense with a printed brief of the points and authorities relied upon. Even a printed argument will not meet the rule in that regard, unless the counsel shall set down in the argument a clear, distinct statement of the points designed to be elaborated in the argument, with the authorities in support thereof immediately following.

/40/ill/58 · .json · Public domain