Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

40 Ill. 77

Anonymous

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1866-04-15

Me. Scates stated to the court that upon the hearing of this cause it would be necessary to produce some of the original papers used on the trial below, with a view to their inspection by the court,-and the detection of certain erasures and interlineations appearing therein, and which do not appear in the transcript, and inquired whether a rule would be entered, upon mere suggestion, requiring the clerk below, in whose custody they were, to send them to this court, or…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1922

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1866-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam :

¶1the clerk of the court below is the legal custodian of the records and files therein, and we have no power to compel him to surrender them to any other person. We may, as we often have done, request the clerk to send to us ^original papers which are in his custody, for our inspection, upon mere suggestion that such inspection would be important in determining the rights of parties, and have no doubt he will readily comply.

¶2We might, perhaps, upon proper application, the necessity of so doing being shown, award a subpoena duces tecum, and thereby require the clerk to appear in person and produce the original papers for the inspection of the court.

¶3In this case we will direct the clerk of this court to communicate to the clerk below, the request of the court to send up the papers, and should that request not be complied with, counsel can then apply for the subpoena duces tecum, if he desires.

/40/ill/77 · .json · Public domain