40 Ill. App. 3d 174 - Robertson v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2001
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 91 Ill. App. 2d 1 - Mount v. McClellan · 37 Ill. App. 2d 327 - Jeffrey v. Chicago Transit Authority · Edwards v. Ely · 69 Ill. App. 2d 316 - Kelly v. Chicago Transit Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Jeffrey v. Chicago Transit Authority, [ 37 Ill. App. 2d 327, 336 , 185 N.E.2d 384, 389 (1962),] the court *** specifically held that even if a defendant’s liability is established, a plaintiff must prove actual damages before he can recover. Applying this rule to the facts of this case, we hold that by his admission of liabilityt,] defendant admitted that the accident resulted from his negligent operation of his vehicle, and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. The mere fact that the accident occurred as a result of defendant’s negligence does not, in any way, establish that plaintiff sustained physical injuries. While plaintiff was relieved, under defendant’s admission of liability, from proving defendant’s negligence and her freedom from contributory negligence, she was required to establish damages occasioned by physical injury.” Robertson, 40 Ill. App. 3d at 177 , 351 N.E.2d at 578-79 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.