40 Ill. App. 3d 753 - People v. Parton’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 1991 · most notably 218 Ill. App. 3d 1 - People v. Aguilar (1991), 72 Ill. App. 3d 249 - People v. Hatfield (1979)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Moore v. Illinois · 19 Ill. 2d 318 - The People v. Wolff · 63 Ill. 2d 443 - People v. Nichols · 43 Ill. 2d 228 - The People v. Sumner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is not this court’s purpose to speculate as to what use the defense could or would have put the evidence in question, or what additional evidence it may or may not have led to, had it been turned over prior to trial. The fact remains that this evidence was not available, as it should have been, to defendant when his defense at trial was being planned and prepared. The belated turnover of these reports after trial was sufficient to deprive defendant of their effective use and in no way cured the harm done by failing to turn them over to defendant initially. [Citations.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The error involved in witholding evidence from discovery is not dependent on an affirmative showing by the defendant that he was prejudiced in fact.” (Emphasis added.) 40 Ill. App. 3d 753, 758 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.