Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 KAN 203 - Mead v. Anderson

Mead v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
October 1984
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1984

10 state decisions

3018881890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smyles v. . Hastings · Holmes v. Seely · Myers v. Dunn · Taylor v. Warnaky · Seeley v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has often been held by this court that the refusing or granting of a temporary injunction is largely in the discretion of the judge or court, and for that reason close and intricate questions will not be reviewed and the action of the court or judge reversed, unless it shall clearly appear that the judgment or order is erroneous. The reason for this is clear, that while a temporary injunction is granted, yet at the final hearing the court will more closely determine the rights of the parties, and then if it is found that the temporary injunction was improvidently granted, it will be dissolved, or not made perpetual.” (p. 204.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . The rule is fundamental that where one purchases land from another, he purchases also the right of access thereto. (Citing cases.) And this right cannot be taken away when once obtained. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.