Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 KAN 442 - Baker v. Stewart

Baker v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
8
states following
December 1963
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1963

16 state decisions

70188818901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bertles v. . Nunan · Chandler v. Cheney · Pray v. Stebbins · Marburg v. Cole · White v. . Wager

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The common law, as modified by constitutional and statutory law, judicial decisions, and the condition and wants of the people, shall remain in force in aid of the general statutes of this state; but the rule of the common law, that statutes in derogation thereof shall be strictly construed, shall not be applicable to any general statute of this state; but all such statutes shall be liberally construed to promote their object.” (Gem Stat. 1868, ch. 119, § 3; Gen. Stat. 1901, § 8014.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.