40 Kan. App. 2d 397 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “K.S.A. 21-3832(a)(1), intimidation of a witness or victim is knowingly and maliciously preventing or dissuading, or attempting to prevent or dissuade, any witness or victim from attending or testifying at any civil or criminal trial”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 58 Kan. App. 2d 570 - State v. Rozell · State v. Rozell

2. “Johnson attempted to prevent the witness . . . from attending or testifying at [the] trial in Reno County. Thus, the proximate result of Johnson's unlawful act occurred in [Kansas]. Based on K.S.A. 21-3104[now K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-5106], the [district court] properly exercised its jurisdiction in convicting and sentencing Johnson.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 58 Kan. App. 2d 570 - State v. Rozell

3. “partly committed [the offense] within this state if the proximate result of the act, i.e., preventing [the alleged victim] from testifying, occurred within this state.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rozell