40 Kan. App. 2d 602 - State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Cunningham v. California · State v. Schoonover · State v. Johnson · State v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant is charged in Count I with the crime of fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer. The defendant pleads not guilty. “To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved: “1. That the defendant was driving a motor vehicle; and “2. That the defendant was given a visual or audible signal by a police officer to bring the motor vehicle to a stop; and “3. That die defendant intentionally failed or refused to bring die motor vehicle to a stop, or otherwise fled or attempted to elude a pursuing police vehicle; and “4. That die police officer giving such a signal was in uniform, prominendy displaying such officer s badge of office; and “5. That die police officer’s vehicle was appropriately marked showing it to be an official police vehicle; “6. That the defendant committed five or more moving violations; “7. That this act occurred on or about the 25tii day of July, 2005, in Wyandotte County, Kansas.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Richardson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.