Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 LAANN 560 - Antoine v. Smith

Antoine v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1991

12 state decisions

20188818901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gravier's Curator v. Carraby's

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Calhoun v. Lane, 89 La. Ann. 596 , 2 So. 219 , we-gave effect to an instrument, as a compromise, which did not contain those formal words. We can see no good reason why their use should be deemed essential. Under our liberal system of practice, nothing is sacramental as a matter of form, unless expressly so declared by statute. The instrument does not contain the phrase, ‘and which every one prefers to the hope of gaining, balanced by the danger of losing,’ which would seem to be equally important. “In our view, the only essential, as a matter of form, which the article quoted requires, is that ‘the contract must be reduced to writing-.’ “Without recapitulating the terms; provisions, and conditions of the instrument, we hold it to be a transaction or compromise in the sense of the Code, and was evidently intended for the purpose of preventing a lawsuit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.