Cunningham v. Ardrox, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2011
3 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co. · Tatro v. Manor Care, Inc. · Keds Corp. v. Renee International Trading Corp. · Carlson Corp. v. University of Vermont · Heins v. Wilhelm Loh Wetzlar Optical Machinery GmbH & Co. KG.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“tortious injury in this commonwealth by an act or omission outside this commonwealth if he regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered, in this commonwealth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While manifestations, effects, and consequences of an out-of-State injury may be experienced in Massachusetts, they do not constitute 'injury in this commonwealth’ within the meaning of § 3(d).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.