40 Md. App. 151 - Ory v. Libersky’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2021
2 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardell · 41 Ill. 2d 236 - Flynn v. Vancil · Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Ex Rel. Castranda · Walston v. Sun Cab Co. · 155 Ind. App. 558 - Burrus v. Silhavy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here is substantial authority for the proposition that . the denial of a motion in limine cannot in and of itself constitute reversible error. State v. Garrett, 183 N.W.2d 652 (Iowa 1971). The court there stated: "It may be error (to deny a motion in limine) but cannot be reversible error. The reason is simple. The objectionable material has not yet reached the jury's ears. It may never reach the jury. ... It is only when the (objectionable) material is offered in the jury's presence that the harm or error, if any, has been done."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“For the death of a spouse, minor child, or parent of a minor child, the damages awarded under subsection (c) [“Damages to be divided among beneficiaries”] are not limited or restricted by the “pecuniary loss” or “pecuniary benefit” rule but may include damages for mental anguish, emotional pain and suffering, loss of society, companionship, comfort, protection, marital care, parental care, filial care, attention, advice, counsel, training, guidance, or education where applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We must also reject the suggestion contained in appellant's brief that because the awards to each of the children were identical, they are suspect or, indeed, invalid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.