Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Md. App. 399 - Biddle v. State

40 Md. App. 399 - Biddle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2005

3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Burks v. United States · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks · State v. Zimmerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ... the trial court [may not] proceed with the trial on the merits until there has been compliance with Rule 735 d, i.e., a determination on the record of a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to trial by jury. Cf. Davis v. State, 278 Md. 103 , 361 A. 2d 113 (1976). A waiver of a constitutional right must appear affirmatively in the record, Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 , 89 S. Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““after inquiry of the defendant on the record, that the defendant has made his election for a court trial with full knowledge of his right to a jury trial and that he has knowingly and voluntarily waived the right.” Md. Rule 735 d.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. ““Because the record in the case sub judice unequivocally shows a non-compliance with Md. Rule 735 d, the trial on the merits should not have proceeded. Ergo, the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.