Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 MICH 14 - Sands v. Davis

Sands v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
September 1941
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1941 · most notably Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co. (1927), Defreese v. Lake (1896)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 12 states

9018791880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If Sands had gone into possession by the aid of the other tenants, or in recognition of their rights, he might in that way, perhaps, have incurred some duties towards them. But he went in as a stranger to their claims, under a claim which denied their existence or validity.” 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The case of Blackwood v. Van Vleit, 30 Mich. 118 , holds, in conformity with these views, that there can be no estoppel against purchasing tax titles except against one who had a duty to pay the tax or remove the burden.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.