40 Mich. App. 115 - Dyke v. Richard’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A claim based on the malpractice of a person who is, or holds himself out to be, a member of a state licensed profession accrues at the time that person (emphasis added) discontinues treating or otherwise serving the plaintiff in a professional or pseudo-professional capacity as. to the matters out of which the claim for malpractice arose.” 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peters v. Golds
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.