Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 NC 313 - Bedsole v. . Monroe

Bedsole v. . Monroe’s Empirical Analysis

1848

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1958
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1958

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

30184818501860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the grounds of the bill be not entirely distinct and not whole; if they arise out of one and the same transaction or series of transactions, forming one course of dealing and all tending to one end; if one connected story can be told of the whole; then the objection (multifariousness) cannot apply.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.