Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 NEB 447 - Dunterman v. Storey

Dunterman v. Storey’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
6
states following
February 1945
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1945

10 state decisions

50189419001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This case from New York is in point; but we are constrained to say that we do not think it sound.” (p. 452.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.