Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 N.J. Super. 559 - State v. Carlston

40 N.J. Super. 559 - State v. Carlston’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1989

6 state decisions

301956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Story v. United States · Commonwealth v. Sherman · Halsted v. State · Ex parte Liotard · State v. . Gibbs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an offense which is malum prohibitum does not require knowledge or intent unless the Legislature clearly so provides”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “under the influence of intoxicating liquor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.