Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
105 federal appellate · 12 district · 92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 404 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. (1995), Smith v. Lightning Bolt Productions, Inc. (1988)
105 federal appellate · 12 district · 92 state decisions — followed in 18 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 404 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has always been held that punitive damages are not available for mere breach of contract, for in such a case only a private wrong, and not a public right, is involved.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[E]nforcement of an [arbitrator's] award of punitive damages as a purely private remedy would violate strong public policy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““ ‘The trouble with an arbitration admitting a power to grant unlimited damages by way of punishment is that if the court treated such an award in the way arbitration awards are usually treated, and followed the award to the letter, it would amount to an unlimited draft upon judicial power. In the usual case, the court stops only to inquire if the award is authorized by the contract; is complete and final on its face; and if the proceeding was fairly conducted. *** If the usual rules were followed there would be no effective judicial supervision over punitive awards in arbitration.’ ” Garrity, 40 N.Y.2d at 358-59 , 386 N.Y.S.2d at 834 , 353 N.E.2d at 796 , quoting Publishers’ Association v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers’ Union (1952), 280 App. Div. 500, 503 , 114 N.Y.S.2d 401, 404 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.