MTR. CHASE MANHATTAN v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 2003 · most notably Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc. (1990), Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Schlossberg (1986)
24 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Section 1-201 (subd. [26] provides, in part, that ‘[a] person “receives” a notice or notification when (a) it comes to his attention; or (b) it is duly delivered at the place of business through which the contract was made or at any other place held out by him as the place for receipt of such communications.’ These two provisions, taken together and without more, establish a requirement of actual notice to the account debtor before the preclusion of setoffs.... The point is that a paper filed with a state office solely as a commercial repository under the Code in order to give constructive notice to all the world is not actual notice. The subordinate official or clerk who receives a financing statement for filing, if he is not to be wasting the taxpayers’ money, has no duty beyond filing and indexing the statement. The indexing and the filing is for the benefit of outsiders whose duty it may be to search the index and read the indexed statements before they extend credit.” Id. at 593, 595 , 357 N.E.2d at 368, 369 , 20 U.C.C.Rep. at 579, 81.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he rights of an assignee are subject to (a) all the terms of the contract between the account debtor and assignor and any other defense or claim arising therefrom; and (b) any other defense or claim of the account debtor against the assignor which accrues before the account debtor receives notification of the assignment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he `first to file' rule [referring to section 9-312(5)], designed to resolve situations where secured parties are competing in asserting superior rights, should not be controlling when the dispute is between a secured party and an account debtor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.