Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Ohio App. 2d 236 - State v. Wingerd

40 Ohio App. 2d 236 - State v. Wingerd’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2014

16 state decisions

11019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Jackson v. Denno · Ker v. State of California · Bumper v. North Carolina · Elkins v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * [Defendant agreed to the search without a word of complaint or objection and in a setting which is not to be equaled with the aura of oppressiveness which oft pervades the precincts of a police station. The trial court held the physical evidence to be admissible, and we cannot say it erred in so doing.” (State v. Wingerd [1974], 40 Ohio App. 2d 236, 238 [ 69 O.O.2d 217 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.