40 Ohio App. 3d 155 - Day v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
87 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably 101 Ohio App. 3d 668 - James v. James (1995), 83 Ohio App. 3d 700 - Baker v. Baker (1992)
87 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kaechele v. Kaechele · Berish v. Berish · Wolfe v. Wolfe · 11 Ohio App. 3d 117 - Blair v. Blair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As plaintiff contends, there may be a de facto termination for alimony purposes prior to [the date of the divorce decree]. However, such de facto termination must be clear and bilateral, not unilateral, as here, and can be manifested by a written separation agreement under R.C. 3103.06. In this case, the record contains no clear evidence that would support a de facto termination on September 1,1984, the date plaintiff vacated the marital residence, as plaintiffs unilateral action is insufficient herein to achieve that end.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“if the *Page 9 award is such that, in effect, it forces a party to dispose of an asset to meet obligations imposed by the court, the tax consequences of that transaction should be considered.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[E]quitable considerations, not any flat rule, dictate the court's determination of a date prior to trial for the purpose of recognizing and valuing marital assets.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.