40 Ohio App. 3d 186 - State v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · City of Oregon v. Szakovits · 35 Ohio App. 2d 221 - Atwell v. State · 24 Ohio App. 3d 38 - State v. Finch · 19 Ohio App. 3d 281 - State v. Van Fossen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a police officer had not observed the arrestee driving in an erratic or unsafe manner, had not witnessed impaired motor coordination, and had not instructed the arrestee to perform field sobriety tests; the officer did not have probable cause to arrest the driver for violation of R.C. 4511.19; i.e., the mere appearance of drunkenness (bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, the odor of alcohol) is not sufficient to constitute probable cause for arrest for driving under the influence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Aurora v. Hennessey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.