Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 OHIOST3D 116 - State v. Cash

State v. Cash’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2023

21 state decisions

15019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kercheval v. United States · State v. Bowen · State v. Reyes · State v. Reyes · United States v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as used in R.C. 2921.41(C)(1) includes both the guilt determination and the imposition of sentence. In Henderson, at paragraphs one and two of the syllabus, we held that a defendant who has pled guilty but is awaiting sentencing for a theft offense has not been previously convicted of a theft offense within the meaning of R.C. 2 January Term, 1994 2913.02(B), and that in order to constitute a prior theft conviction, there must be a judgment of conviction, as defined in Crim.R. 32(B), for the prior offense. Crim.R. 32(B) provides that a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] prior conviction in which pronouncement of sentence is still pending may be used for impeachment purposes pursuant to Evid.R. 609(A).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea, the verdict or findings, and the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.