Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 OHIOST3D 341 - State v. Milligan

State v. Milligan’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Osie (Slip Opinion) (2014), Dobbins v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1996)

43 state decisions

17019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Weatherford v. Bursey · Lewis v. United States · Lanza v. State of New York · 24 Cal. 3d 742 - Barber v. Municipal Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) whether the government deliberately intruded in order to obtain confidential and privileged information, (2) whether the government obtained directly or indirectly any evidence which was or could be used at trial as a result of the intrusion, (3) whether any information obtained was or could be used in any manner detrimental to the defendant, and (4) whether details about trial preparation were learned by the government.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Implicit within the meaning of [the constitutional right to counsel] is the right of a criminal defendant to consult privately with his attorney.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[e]vidence obtained through the unauthorized interception of a private conversation between a criminal defendant and his attorney is subject to suppression pursuant to Section 10 , Article I of the Ohio Constititution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.