State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Joseph (1995), State v. Spirko (1991)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. New York · State v. Adams · State v. Maurer · State v. Apanovitch · Gleason v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the prosecution's failure to disclose was a willful violation of Crim.R. 16, (2) that foreknowledge of the [evidence] would have benefited the accused in preparation of his defense, or (3) that the accused was prejudiced by admission of the statement.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[C]ircumstantial evidence bearing upon the probative value of other evidence in the case can also be of consequence to the action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is of consequence to the action because it might determine whether the jury believes a particular witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. [C.W.] · State v. Kaufman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.