People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2021
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Helen Frances Sutton Root v. Isabel H. Gauper · People v. Amato · People v. Unruh · People v. Rivas · People v. Kluhsman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“complex and multiple tasks to perform in addition to identifying and apprehending persons committing serious criminal offenses,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Hebert“aid individuals who are in danger of physical harm”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Hebert“provide other services on an emergency basis”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Hebert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.