¶1This Court concurs in the instructions of the' Judge below to the jury. The facts were for their consideration : we perceive no error in their conclusion. .
¶2The motion is dismissed.
¶3Motion dismissed.
40 S.C.L. 112
State v. Lythgoe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 15, 1852
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1852-12-15
Before Withers, }., at- Barnwell, Fall Term, 1852. The report of his Honor, the presiding Judge, is as follows : “ Lythgoe was indicted for obstructing Fairfield-street, in the town of Aiken. A plan of town, (that is, a paper purporting to be such,) was introduced on behalf of the prosecution ; which Wm.
Decided 1852-12-15