¶1(’concurring specially). While I do not think the record hierie&i sustains*, in toto, the is'taibemient of fadts fioumld in. the majority opinion, I am of the opinion that the record: shlows defendant Fowler to be, for reasons other than those stafceld in ¡the majority opinion,, .the holder of ‘at least the complete equitable title to s'aiidl lands. I therefore concur in the result.
40 S.D. 244
Carrol v. Fowler
Decided March 26, 1918
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1918-03-26
Hon. Frank B. .SmiTi-i, Judge. Action by Jamies D. Carrol, against AV. A. Fowler and others, to determine adverse ownership and claim's to realty. From a judgment for defendant Fowler, and from an order 'denying a new trial, plaintiff appeal's. (1) To point one of the opinion, Appellant efited: Gibson v. Smith 24 S. D. 514. Respondent cited: Pol.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1961
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1918-03-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →