Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 So. 2d 120 - Noeling v. State

40 So. 2d 120 - Noeling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1992

16 state decisions

60194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Reddy · Trapp v. Territory of New Mexico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is probable that any one of the above errors may not in and of itself constitute reversible error, but when considered as a whole we are satisfied that the ends of justice require a new trial."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a circumstance of guilt to be considered by the jury under appropriate instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may re-examine a witness about any matter brought out on cross-examination,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.