Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 So. 2d 489 - Fried v. Edmiston

40 So. 2d 489 - Fried v. Edmiston’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1959
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Siegel v. Helis · Roussel v. Railways Realty Co. · City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. · Doll v. Meyer · Davidson v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * in all cases where two or more persons lay claim to land by recorded title and where neither of said claimants are in the actual possession of the land so claimed; either of the claimants may bring suit against one or all the adverse claimants, and for that purpose may join one or more adverse claimants in the same suit as defendants, to have the titles to the land adjudicated upon by the court having jurisdiction of the property, * * * and this action shall be known as the action to establish title to real estate, and the judge shall decide which of the claimants are the owners of the land in dispute * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.