40 So. 3d 293 - State v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm · 950 So. 2d 583 - State v. Draughn · Draughn v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Jointly indicted defendants shall be tried jointly unless: (1) The state elects to try them separately; or (2) The court, on motion of the defendant, and after contradictory hearing with the district attorney, is satisfied that justice requires a severance.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“out the front.” . Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968); Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). . This Court has previously recognized that antagonistic defenses are not the only instances where the denial of a motion to sever will constitute an abuse of discretion. Where the ends of justice will be best served by severance, it should be granted. State v. Massey, 91 So.3d at 476 ; State v. Coe, 40 So.3d at 302 . See also State v. Webb, 424 So.2d 233, 236 (La.1982). .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.