40 So. 3d 477 - Burnett v. Vector Electric & Controls, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 660 So. 2d 7 - Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co. · 857 So. 2d 407 - Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis · 696 So. 2d 176 - Fontenot v. JK Richard Trucking · 950 So. 2d 902 - Doyal v. VERNON PARISH SCHOOL BD. · Aday v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in this Title shall prohibit an employer from inquiring about previous injuries, disabilities, or other medical conditions and the employee shall answer truthfully; failure to answer truthfully shall result in the employee’s forfeiture of benefits under this Chapter, provided said failure to answer directly relates to the medical condition for which a claim for benefits is made or affects the employer’s ability to receive reimbursement from the second injury fund. This Section shall not be enforceable unless the written form on which the inquiries about previous medical conditions are made contains a notice advising the employee that his failure to answer truthfully may result in his forfeiture of worker’s compensation benefits under R.S. 23:1208.1. Such notice shall be prominently displayed in bold faced block lettering of no less than ten point type.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.