40 So. 3d 531 - Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Newton · Heidel v. State · 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A criminal defendant is entitled to present his defense to the finder of fact, and it is fundamentally unfair to deny the jury the opportunity to consider the defendant's defense where there is testimony to support the theory.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“all evidence admitted in support of the defendant's theory of the case must comport with the Mississippi Rules of Evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“¶ 16. The jury instruction states: The Court instructs the Jury that under law, the intent to kill one human being transfers to the actual victim and if you believe from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that on the day in question, the Defendant, Walter Carpenter, had the deliberate design to kill Jewell Carpenter, but instead, accidentally killed Maurice Carpenter, the killing of Maurice Carpenter is nevertheless murder under the law, unless you believe the Defendant Walter Carpenter acted in necessary self-defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carpenter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.