Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 SO3D 657 - Harris v. Waters

Harris v. Waters’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 174 Ind. App. 537 - In the Matter of Estate of Newman · Mwf v. Ddf · Scott v. Scott · Williams v. Delta Regional Medical Center · Walters v. Walters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An exception to the final judgment rule is found Rule 54(b) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows the trial court to expressly direct the entry of final judgment as to fewer than all claims or parties in the action. Rule 54(b) states: Judgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple parties. When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counter-claim, cross-claim or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an expressed determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an expressed direction for the entry of the judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated which adjudicates fewer than all of the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all of the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties and the order or other form if decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all of the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A final, appealable judgment ... adjudicates the merits of the controversy [and] settles all issues as to all the parties, and requires no further action by the [ruling] court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “adjudicates fewer than all of the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.