40 So. 3d 72 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
74 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery · Taylor v. State · 997 So. 2d 403 - In Re Standard Instruct. in Cr. Cases No. 2007-10 · Medlin v. Medlin · 951 So. 2d 91 - Hall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court commits fundamental error in giving the standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter by act where the defendant is convicted of a crime no more than one step removed from the improperly instructed offense.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lopez v. State · Fenster v. State“(1) Does the standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter constitute fundamental error? (2) Is attempted manslaughter a viable offense in light of State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010)?”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“intended to cause the death of (the victim)” and adding the word”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.